Week 1 - Technology Integration Framework
A technology integration framework that could be used by my district, the Pittsburg Unified School District in California, is the Triple E Framework by Kolb (2020). This framework focuses on ways that technology will engage students, enhance learning beyond what could be done without it, and extend learning beyond the classroom. If technology does not do these things, it is likely not helpful to use it in a lesson.
For example, if a teacher has students use technology to fill out an online worksheet instead of a paper one, that does not add much in terms of engaging them, enhancing the learning, or extending it. It simply provides a different format. There may be some small enhancements, such as the ability for students to access spell checking or other word processing tools. If they use technology to play an interactive game that engages students, or to use a tool that helps students model and manipulate a concept they are learning. If they use it to facilitate having students work in groups on a shared document, research online, or communicate with students in another place, those are ways the technology could contribute much more to the learning.
Pittsburg Unified School District has 1-1 technology access for students. It provides a Chromebook for each student. In its "Vision 2027" document, it asserts that "Equitable and accessible technology will connect the world to every student." (Pittsburg Unified School District, n.d.) They also emphasize making sure students have access to high-speed internet. While there has been this investment and commitment to provide the equipment, there has been very little guidance from the district about how the technology should be used. During the COVID-19 Pandemic, the district provided teachers with Google accounts, and our high school teachers were to use Google Classroom. The district also uses Clever as a single sign-on, where some other tools are available, such as iReady for district assessments, some online textbooks, and other administrative and educational tools. Teachers are largely left to their own devices in terms of how they use the technology in their lessons. Because of this, some use technology in ways that do not add much to a lesson, such as filling out online worksheets or turning in assignments via Google Classroom. Other teachers are much more creative, and some tend to avoid the technology, particularly since students are increasingly using AI to cheat on assignments.
The Triple E framework would provide a good guide in this context, so that the technology the district spent so much to provide would be used to enrich lessons and increase learning.
The Triple E framework would be relevant to the District's Vision 2027 goals, to effectively connect the students to the world, and to encourage critical thinking, strong communication, and collaboration, which are also emphasized. It would also fit with this year's focus initiatives in the district, which include efforts to increase equity and student discourse.
Clear connections can be made from this Framework to the ISTE Standards. For example, all of the ISTE standards for students (2016) are focused on how the use of technology can enhance learning. They provide a guide for students to become empowered learners, digital citizens, knowledge constructors, innovative designers, and creative communicators. They also extend the learning in the focus on being global collaborators. These activities would also engage students much more than passive technology use.
This Framework lines up with the evaluation tool used in the district. Teachers are evaluated using a district tool based on the California Standards for the Teaching Profession (2024), which includes standards for "Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning" and "Planning and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students". It doesn't explicitly mention technology, but the Triple E framework would be a good fit to address the competencies when technology is included.
The Triple E Framework is simple for teachers to remember, fits well with the current district guidance and evaluation, and would provide a valuable guide for any teachers using technology in the classroom. It is likely that some training may be required to help some teachers apply it in the classroom.
References
California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (2024). California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP). Sacramento, CA: Author.
Kolb, L. (2020). Triple E Framework. Retrieved from: https://www.tripleeframework.com/
Pittsburg Unified School District. (n.d.). "PUSD vision 2027: Graduate profile & design principles." https://pittsburgusd.net/documents/PUSD_Vision_2027.pdf
Integration Graphic by Gerd Altmann/geralt on Pixabay: https://pixabay.com/photos/integration-migration-refugee-2489613/


Hi Joanne! Nice to have another class with you this semester. You really have a clear and insightful way of explaining the differences between simply using digital tools and truly transforming the learning experience with technology. It's a key distinction that educators need to understand, and your examples of online worksheets versus collaborative documents and interactive games illustrate the point perfectly. Nice work! Good luck this semester!
ReplyDeleteHello Joanne! Wow! So much of what you mentioned about how your district uses technology resonated with me. You mentioned that while Pittsburg Unified has invested in 1:1 devices, there seems to be little guidance on how teachers should use that technology to truly enhance learning. Your point about the difference between simply digitizing worksheets verses using tech to extend and engage learning really stood out to me. I see the same challenge in Illinois where tech is used more as an organizational tool. I think you made wonderful points about how Triple E would connect to your district's vision and fit into your evaluation process. Triple E seems to be a great jumping off point to start actively evaluating how teachers and students in your district are really using tech. I am curious on how much professional development is offered in your district to support tech use that enhances student learning. Do you thing your district could rationally set aside time for Triple E training, especially for those who may be overwhelmed with integrating new technology? Wishing you a great semester!
ReplyDeleteYou did a great job highlighting both the strengths and the gaps in your district’s current approach to technology. I like how you gave clear, concrete examples of when technology simply substitutes a task versus when it truly engages, enhances, or extends learning. That contrast makes your argument for the Triple E Framework very convincing. It’s also powerful that you tied it back to Vision 2027 and to the California Standards for the Teaching Profession, showing that the framework would not only guide teachers but also align well with existing expectations. Your point about teachers being left largely on their own really stood out, because without a consistent framework, it’s easy for technology to become underutilized or misused. Framing the Triple E as a simple, practical, and supportive tool feels like the right solution, and I think your suggestion for training is key to ensuring it has real impact across the district.
ReplyDelete